<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog Engage Goes Invitation Only</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.evolutionarydesigns.net/blog/2010/02/09/blog-engage-goes-invitation-only/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.evolutionarydesigns.net/blog/2010/02/09/blog-engage-goes-invitation-only/</link>
	<description>New Media News and Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:51:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: What other bloggers are saying about blog engage &#124; Blog Engage Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.evolutionarydesigns.net/blog/2010/02/09/blog-engage-goes-invitation-only/comment-page-1/#comment-952</link>
		<dc:creator>What other bloggers are saying about blog engage &#124; Blog Engage Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 14:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evolutionarydesigns.net/blog/2010/02/09/blog-engage-goes-invitation-only/#comment-952</guid>
		<description>[...] Blog Engage Goes Invitation Only By Element321 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blog Engage Goes Invitation Only By Element321 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: element321</title>
		<link>http://www.evolutionarydesigns.net/blog/2010/02/09/blog-engage-goes-invitation-only/comment-page-1/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>element321</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evolutionarydesigns.net/blog/2010/02/09/blog-engage-goes-invitation-only/#comment-416</guid>
		<description>Thanks for  catching that. It is now fixed 
My recent post &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/www.evolutionarydesigns.net\/blog\/2010\/02\/12\/google-announces-improvements\/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Google Announces Improvements and Response to Feedback&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for  catching that. It is now fixed<br />
My recent post <a href="http:\/\/www.evolutionarydesigns.net\/blog\/2010\/02\/12\/google-announces-improvements\/" target="_blank">Google Announces Improvements and Response to Feedback</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandeep Hegde</title>
		<link>http://www.evolutionarydesigns.net/blog/2010/02/09/blog-engage-goes-invitation-only/comment-page-1/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep Hegde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evolutionarydesigns.net/blog/2010/02/09/blog-engage-goes-invitation-only/#comment-414</guid>
		<description>Hello, 
 
There is an broken link in the post. you have linked to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogenage.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.blogenage.com/&lt;/a&gt; instead of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogengage.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.blogengage.com/&lt;/a&gt; 
 
Just letting you know. 
 
Meanwhile I would love to receive an invite :) 
My recent post &lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sandeephegde/~3/e_9QgktAYV4/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Happy Shivratri&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, </p>
<p>There is an broken link in the post. you have linked to <a href="http://www.blogenage.com/" target="_blank">http://www.blogenage.com/</a> instead of <a href="http://www.blogengage.com/" target="_blank">http://www.blogengage.com/</a> </p>
<p>Just letting you know. </p>
<p>Meanwhile I would love to receive an invite <img src='http://www.evolutionarydesigns.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
My recent post <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sandeephegde/~3/e_9QgktAYV4/" target="_blank">Happy Shivratri</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogging ictTrends</title>
		<link>http://www.evolutionarydesigns.net/blog/2010/02/09/blog-engage-goes-invitation-only/comment-page-1/#comment-391</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogging ictTrends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evolutionarydesigns.net/blog/2010/02/09/blog-engage-goes-invitation-only/#comment-391</guid>
		<description>After the invitation Only is implemented BlogEngage will rise in value too as well as we too rise. Now new bloggers will be requesting us for invitation, isn&#039;t it? Just kiddding. 
 
This new change, I feel, has two facets. On the one hand, we can expect than more genuine and good blogs will be participating and the society will be cleaner. At the same time, will new blogs really dying of getting in into BlogEngage community. Did we reduced the scope by raising high fences. Did BlogEngage believe that the number of blogs in its premises is overcrowded already? Otherwise, it would have been better to develop and implement alternate measures to keep the community cleaner and more useful than to build a higher and stronger Iron-gates. 
 
You can disagree with me. I just expressed my feelings. 
My recent post &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/www.icttrends.com\/2010\/02\/commenting-on-others-post-wont-increase.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Commenting on Other&#8217;s Post Won&#8217;t Increase Your Blog Ranking&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the invitation Only is implemented BlogEngage will rise in value too as well as we too rise. Now new bloggers will be requesting us for invitation, isn&#039;t it? Just kiddding. </p>
<p>This new change, I feel, has two facets. On the one hand, we can expect than more genuine and good blogs will be participating and the society will be cleaner. At the same time, will new blogs really dying of getting in into BlogEngage community. Did we reduced the scope by raising high fences. Did BlogEngage believe that the number of blogs in its premises is overcrowded already? Otherwise, it would have been better to develop and implement alternate measures to keep the community cleaner and more useful than to build a higher and stronger Iron-gates. </p>
<p>You can disagree with me. I just expressed my feelings.<br />
My recent post <a href="http:\/\/www.icttrends.com\/2010\/02\/commenting-on-others-post-wont-increase.html" target="_blank">Commenting on Other&rsquo;s Post Won&rsquo;t Increase Your Blog Ranking</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bloging tips</title>
		<link>http://www.evolutionarydesigns.net/blog/2010/02/09/blog-engage-goes-invitation-only/comment-page-1/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>bloging tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evolutionarydesigns.net/blog/2010/02/09/blog-engage-goes-invitation-only/#comment-390</guid>
		<description>After the invitation Only is implemented BlogEngage will rise in value too as well as we too rise. Now new bloggers will be requesting us for invitation, isn&#039;t it? Just kiddding.

This new change, I feel, has two facets. On the one hand, we can expect than more genuine and good blogs will be participating and the society will be cleaner. At the same time, will new blogs really dying of getting in into BlogEngage community. Did we reduced the scope by raising high fences. Did BlogEngage believe that the number of blogs in its premises is overcrowded already? Otherwise, it would have been better to develop and implement alternate measures to keep the community cleaner and more useful than to build a higher and stronger Iron-gates.

You can disagree with me. I just expressed my feelings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the invitation Only is implemented BlogEngage will rise in value too as well as we too rise. Now new bloggers will be requesting us for invitation, isn&#8217;t it? Just kiddding.</p>
<p>This new change, I feel, has two facets. On the one hand, we can expect than more genuine and good blogs will be participating and the society will be cleaner. At the same time, will new blogs really dying of getting in into BlogEngage community. Did we reduced the scope by raising high fences. Did BlogEngage believe that the number of blogs in its premises is overcrowded already? Otherwise, it would have been better to develop and implement alternate measures to keep the community cleaner and more useful than to build a higher and stronger Iron-gates.</p>
<p>You can disagree with me. I just expressed my feelings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

